Electapres.com
ELECTAPRES.COM
The Road to the White House
< >
  Home | Quiz | Candidates | Research | Electoral College Calculator | Quotes | Advertising | About | Privacy | RSS |  ATOM/XML
Editor's Picks
ABC
American Spectator
AP via NYT
Atlantic
Boston Globe
CBS
Chicago Tribune
CNN
CQ Politics
Dallas News
FOX
Gallup Poll
Huffington Post
Human Events
Inside Washington
LA Times
Media Matters
Mother Jones
Nation
National Journal Gate
National Review
NBC
Newsweek
New Republic
New York Daily News
New York Observer
New York Sun
New York Times
Politico
Project Vote Smart
Reuters
Roll Call
Salon
Scripps
SF Chronicle
Slate
Time
Town Hall
WSJ
Washington Post
Washington Times
Washington Whispers
Weekly Standard
YouTube


Notable Quotables
"

There is a myth around I don't dress well. I dress very well -- I just don't look so good. - Barbara Bush
All quotes

Quotes


« Previous | Home | Next »

October 21, 2007

2009 Is Looking a Lot Like 1993

The New York Times (register)

For many Democrats, the coming election promises not just the hope of a presidential victory, but the realistic prospect of entering 2009 in control of both Congress and the White House in the same way when Bill Clinton assumed office in 1993.

That was a long time ago, when the economy was in a far different condition than it is today. But in some ways the early debate among Democratic economic policy mavens is already breaking along similar lines.

“The last time Democrats really had a vibrant debate about what kind of economic policy we should have was in 1993,” said Andrei Cherney, founder and co-editor of “Democracy: A Journal of Ideas.” “But now the question is whether the right answer in 1993 is still the right answer for 2009. And that’s an issue we can’t wait until 2009 to confront.”

In 1993, within the Clinton administration, Robert E. Rubin, then the White House domestic policy coordinator, led a camp that argued that the highest priority, even as the economy was still struggling to gain traction, should be to cut the deficit by raising taxes and keeping spending under control. On the other side was a group led by Robert Reich, who, as Labor Secretary, pushed for an aggressive domestic spending program to spur the economy built around public investment in infrastructure and jobs programs.

Posted by Editor at October 21, 2007 07:40 AM

[Filed under: Election Process Archive, History]

« Previous | Home | Next »



< Advertisement >